Temptation with uncertain normative preference

نویسندگان

  • John E. Stovall
  • Peter Hammond
  • Takashi Hayashi
چکیده

We model a decision maker who anticipates being tempted but is also uncertain about what is normatively best. Our model is an extended version of Gul and Pesendorfer’s (2001) with three time periods: in the ex ante period the agent chooses a set of menus, in the interim period she chooses a menu from this set, and in the final period she chooses from the menu. We posit axioms from the ex ante perspective. Our main axioms on preference state that the agent prefers flexibility in the ex ante period and the option to commit in the interim period. Our representation is a generalization of Dekel et al.’s (2009) and identifies the agent’s multiple normative preferences and multiple temptations. We also characterize the uncertain normative preference analogue to the representation of Stovall (2010). Finally, we characterize the special case where normative preference is not uncertain. This special case allows us to uniquely identify all components of the representations of Dekel et al. (2009) and Stovall (2010).

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Temptation, Welfare and Revealed Preference∗

Choice may be determined both by a consideration of one’s welfare (normative preference) and by desires (temptation preference). To provide foundations for such a theory, Gul and Pesendorfer [10, 11] adopt a preference over choice problems as a primitive and hypothesize that temptation creates a preference for commitment. This paper argues that temptation may in fact create the absence of a pre...

متن کامل

Choice and Normative Preference

Due to factors such as temptation, choices may not respect normative preference (the agent’s own, subjective view of what constitutes his welfare). Nevertheless, the evidence on preference reversals suggests a means of recovering normative preference from choice. A de…nition of normative preference in terms of choices between su¢ ciently delayed alternatives is formulated and studied. Mild cond...

متن کامل

Temptation and Revealed Preference

Gul and Pesendorfer [9] model the static behavior of an agent who ranks menus prior to the experience of temptation. This paper models the dynamic behavior of an agent whose ranking of menus itself is subject to temptation. The representation for the agent’s dynamically inconsistent choice behavior views him as possessing a dynamically consistent view of what choices he “should”make (a normativ...

متن کامل

Multiple Temptations1

We use a preference-over-menus framework to model a decision maker who is a¤ected by multiple temptations. Our two main axioms on preference, Exclusion and Inclusion, identify when the agent would want to restrict his choice set and when he would want to expand his choice set. An agent who is tempted would want to restrict his choice set by excluding the normatively worst alternative of that ch...

متن کامل

Perfectionism and Choice∗

Perfectionism can be mentally costly for people who deviate from selfimposed norms of behavior. I model perfectionism in Gul and Pesendorfer’s (2001) framework where agents can be tempted by immediate consumption. Besides normative and temptation utilities, my model identifies a mental cost of perfectionism that is proportional to the difference between the decision maker’s actual choices and h...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2017